Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Belgium Slashing Weekly Online Casino Deposit Limit by 60 Percent editorial policy.
  1. Hotel Oasis Casino Reopening in West Bank Causes Mixed Reactions

Compare Accounts
×
Gaming Industry Adding to Better Outlook for Massachusetts Job Numbers
Provider
Name
Description
DraftKings Bandwagon Gets Another Rider as Oppenheimer Starts Coverage With Lofty Target  Soloviev Reworks East Side Manhattan Casino Plan to Include Affordable Housing  Another Contender Drops Out as Fracture Forces Maxfield from 2020 Kentucky Derby Campaign  Ex-Crown Director Claims Casino Inquiry Chair Forced Resignation  Kentucky Tracks See Big Jump as Wagering on Historical Racing Machines Tops $2 Billion in FY19  Macau Travel Numbers Improving this Month, Say Analysts  Illegal Gambling Lands Singapore Man Tied to LaLiga Soccer Club Owner in Jail  Ex-Star Sydney Casino Baccarat Dealer Guilty in $345K Betting Scam  US Supreme Court to Hear Texas Tribal Gaming Case, Could Impact Claims in Rhode Island, Maine, Massachusetts  Crown Resorts Faces New Regulatory Fines in Victoria Over Blank Checks